William Katz: Urgent Agenda
|
||
|
GOOD MOVE FOR HILLARY – AT 6:01 P.M. ET: We wonder if this cleared the White House, amidst all the speculation this week that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are, inevitably, drifting apart. Hillary herself said that she wouldn't serve in a second Obama administration, a statement that didn't arouse much surprise. She couldn't get to the left of Obama politically. There isn't much room. But she could get to his right on foreign policy, while maintaining her liberal credentials in domestic affairs. That was the pattern for the Democratic Party at the height of its power. Now Hillary makes a firm move in foreign relations, as reported by The New York Times:
Firmness toward China has not been a distinguishing feature of American foreign policy, and this is refreshing. The Chinese have acted quite belligerently recently, and must understand that Americans are not marshmallows. Well, not most of us. Bush 41 was a notable appeaser of China, sending the "realist," Brent Scowcroft, to make nice to the Chinese while the blood from the Tiananmen Square massacres was still drying. That set an embarrassing tone that has gone on too long.
COMMENT: It still remains to be seen what kind of real pressure can be applied to China. But the Chinese, with their burgeoning international trade and influence, certainly wouldn't want to be isolated at the UN on behalf of a rogue nation like Iran. It will be intriguing to see where Clinton goes with this issue, and whether any daylight will open, in the off-the-record paragraphs of the nation's media, between and Hillary and Barack. January 29, 2010 |
|