William Katz: Urgent Agenda
|
||
|
WITH ALL OF OUR PROBLEMS – AT 8:10 A.M. ET: They call themselves "progressives," but they're really regressives. Their dream is to return America to the thinking, and the rhetoric, of the late 1960s. I stress late 1960s, for the engine of their dreams, the Democratic Party, has rejected the early sixties of Jack Kennedy. Who needs that "pay any price, bear any burden" stuff, when you can get free stuff? And so we currently have NOW, the National Organization of a few Women, announcing its latest demand of the Obama administration. And it's back to the sixties. From the Daily Caller:
I'm all for women getting a fair share, but what she's asking for is a quota. Does the term "un-American" come to mind? How about selecting the best people, a number of whom will be women.
COMMENT: Yeah, right. American women will really benefit from having a weaker national defense. What O'Neill is really talking about is not a pro-woman agenda, but a leftist agenda. She might look around the world and note that some of the most effective, and successful, women leaders of modern time – like Golda Meir, Margaret Thatcher, and Angela Merkel, have been very strong on military defense. Many "feminist" organizations seem today more interested in left-wing politics than in the condition of women. Their silence in the face of the horrible abuse of Muslim women tells the story. December 6, 2012
|
|