William Katz: Urgent Agenda
|
||
|
THURSDAY, JANUARY 24, 2008
So now the liberals have decided that the Clintons are deceitful bums after all. The Washington Post deconstructs Hillary's claims about Obama, and a former Democratic Senate majority leader, the defeated Tom Daschle, is now leading a "truth squad" against the Clinton campaign. My, how the flighty have fallen. Did you think the Democratic race would be this much fun? I have the feeling it will get even better. Super Tuesday is less than two weeks from now. As the Oscar-nominated film title says, "There will be blood." You know, I could start feeling sorry for Bill Clinton. It lasts a minute.
We now know for a fact, unless facts are meaningless, that the so-called anti-war movement during the Vietnam War actually prolonged the war. It gave aid and comfort to our enemies, and damaged American will. It was not an anti-war movement, to be sure, but a movement against American victory. What is startling is that North Vietnamese leaders, in interviews and writings after the war, openly acknowledged how their cause was helped by "anti-war" activists in the United States. These divestment-from-Israel resolutions, which presumably are designed to "end the occupation," will, in fact, have the opposite effect. A leader of Hamas will take comfort in them, and increase his efforts to destroy Israel, which is Hamas's stated goal. Moderates will be hurt by them. That's pretty obvious, and yet powerful forces within some church groups propose the resolutions. I wonder why. If Israel were an enemy of the United States, would they be doing the same thing? Hmm. • I have sinned. In this space yesterday I used the term, "tow the line." Reader Frank W. Kelley reminds me that it should, of course, be "toe the line." As punishment, I have watched two DVDs of Christiane Amanpour. What a wit.
What is frustrating about stories like this, though, is the failure to confront the basic issue: Some countries may refuse to give up nuclear dreams, no matter how much pressure is put on them. They want those weapons, and they will bear all risks to get them. There's a whole segment of "elite" opinion that cannot, emotionally or intellectually, deal with the reality of savage or genocidal regimes. In their conceit, they believe everyone in the world thinks exactly as they do. Everything can be negotiated. Everyone is basically rational. Let us reason together. Japan bombed Pearl Harbor, Hitler invaded the Soviet Union. Both were, from a long-term military viewpoint, irrational acts that led to horrors. Yet, we still do not learn.
Really? Have you read any new or dramatic scientific evidence about global warming that's come out in the last weeks? Any headlines? Any breaking into regularly scheduled programs? I haven't, and I'm pretty much up on things. What I am reading is that thoughtful dissenters, including scientists who actually know something about the subject, are being listened to more carefully. The story contains this:
If I had to listen to Gore, I'd store up the caffeine too.
More later. Posted on January 24, 2008.
|
|