William Katz: Urgent Agenda
|
||
|
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 23, 2008 • Let me just thank readers for your great response to HOW McCAIN BEATS HILLARY, published here yesterday. Planning, troops. It's all in the planning. Coming soon: HOW McCAIN BEATS OBAMA.
Do you recall when the Bush administration used to speak that way? Ah yes, I remember it well. But those are days past. Now we go to big meetings, where refreshments are served, and come up with sweeping resolutions against Iran, like the one described in this New York Sun piece, published today. We quote:
Well, that'll show 'em. You keep enriching that stuff, Mr. Ahmedinijad and we'll, we'll...sharpen things. You can't push Uncle Sam around! Do you get the feeling that our foreign policy is haunted by the ghost of Carter past?
Read the whole piece. This has been happening elsewhere as well. There have been reports that, in some Swedish cities, firemen need police escorts to enter some Muslim areas because they are constantly harassed and attacked. Say this in some American universities, and you're guilty of hate speech.
I admit that I've only seen three of the movies nominated for best picture - "No Country for Old Men," "There Will be Blood," and "Juno." The first two were well made, but they forgot to put on endings, something that I'm sure can be cleared up when these movies are sent in for warranty repairs. "Juno" was delightful, and, if I may use a dirty word in Hollywood these days, entertaining. I hope it wins, if only to show that entertainment is still appreciated. By the way, this site uses "movies," not "films." "Movie" reminds us of what we're talking about. A film is something your dentist puts in front of a light box to show you that you need $4,000 worth of work, none of which is insured.
Richard Nixon was hardly loved when he ran for reelection in 1972, but he destroyed George McGovern because people had no confidence in McGovern. We may think, since memory distorts, that Ronald Reagan's 1980 victory was a done deal, but in fact it was a struggle. Reagan was portrayed as a warmed-over movie actor who didn't have a brain, was a risk to the peace, and was a joker who read lines off a teleprompter. Jimmy "ich bin ein Palestinian" Carter was an incumbent. He was plagued with problems, but many conventional wisdom purveyors thought he would win because he was the more "serious" candidate. Reagan, though, won the voters' confidence, they didn't like Carter personally, and Reagan was remarkable in laying out his vision of America. What many don't realize today is that, in the face of heavy media skepticism, Ronald Reagan won a landslide electoral-vote victory almost as great as Nixon's. He received 489 electoral votes to Carter's 49. Carter won only a handful of states. Nixon, in 1972, won 520 electoral votes to McGovern's 17, although his popular vote margin was much greater than was Reagan's in 1980. Reagan corrected that little problem when he ran for reelection against Walter Mondale in 1984.
Oh, so that's it. Reminds me of the 1936 Olympics in Berlin, when the Nazis took down all the anti-Jewish stuff until the games ended. Ah, Olympic tradition. What would we do without it? Look, if you must get your online kicks, here's the link to Air China. October is nice. Posted on January 23, 2008.
|
|