William Katz / Urgent Agenda
|
|||
|
SNIPPETS
SIZZLING SITES Power Line
|
SUNDAY, JULY 26, 2009
COMMENT: Let's see how the Obama administration handles this one. North Korea has made statements like this, not for years, but for decades. But every "offer" of negotiations has ended with some great proclamation of victory for the "dialogue," some kind of paper agreement, and then North Korea violating that agreement but offering to get it back on track if only we'd make further concessions. If we jump at this like amateurs, we'll look like fools...except to the left-wing base of Mr. Obama's party. Watch Hillary carefully on this one. I suspect she'll make known her views privately to friendly journalists, then in effect challenge the White House to override her. July 26, 2009 Permalink
COMMENT: Here, as a great general once said, is an opportunity to excel. In this case, an opportunity for the Republican Party - not an organization always known for imagination. In effect, Conrad is saying that Republican help is needed. Republicans should give that help, in the form of creative, practical ideas to cure the problems in our health-care system. No clichés. None of this endlessly boring stuff about "the great Amurikan free enterprise system." No scare stories about "gumm-int." But good ideas. People don't realize that Ronald Reagan came to office on the power of ideas, not just opposition. Newt Gingrich led the GOP to victory in the 1994 midterms on the power of a contract with America. Now the GOP, following on a faltering Democratic Party, has a chance to shine by showing how problems can be solved. Do it. Do it. Do it. July 26, 2009 Permalink
COMMENT: Whether she seeks office again or not, she can become an effective spokeswoman for conservative values, and she can be a thorn in the side of an ever-more-irresponsible press. But she must prepare herself, be thoroughly familiar with the issues, and not try to wing it. Democrats fear her, and they will attack. She must be ready, emotionally and substantively, to respond effectively to every blow. That will be her first test. July 26, 2009 Permalink
COMMENT: I wonder if she's told Obama about this new, rigid "not allow" stand. A note would do. Maybe an e-mail. She should tell Biden, or tell someone to tell Biden. Or put a "Dear Joe" message in the personals. The question, of course, is how she's going to enforce her words. The president barely made it to a microphone to denounce the violence against freedom demonstrators in Tehran. Will he develop some spine? The secretary speaks of major powers being "united" in preventing an Iranian nuke. Really? Russia, too? Will Germany surrender its lucrative trade with Iran to stand with us? We have a critical five months coming up. Obama has given Iran until the end of the year to show progress in curtailing its nuclear program. What happens then? July 26, 2009 Permalink
Today's result reflects reaction to the president's comments about the Cambridge, Massachusetts, case at his press conference earlier in the week. Certainly didn't help him. The White House has to be concerned, not about one day's results, but about the incessant downward slide in recent weeks, starting with the president's indifferent handling of the opposition mini-revolt in Iran. July 26, 2009 Permalink
And...
This, of course, is a farce. When Obama speaks of a "teachable moment," he's speaking about a one-way street. Teach it from the politically correct perspective. There's no doubt there is racial profiling in some areas. There's no doubt that some police officers are bigoted and should be rooted out. The racial history of the country is troubling, to say the least. Whoever doubts that might try to answer President Kennedy's question: What white American would prefer to be black? At the same time, these "dialogues" about race are never honest because every white participant fears the label "racist" if he dares to bring up the pathologies within minority communities that add to the tragedy. Some 80% of the children of Harlem don't know who their fathers are. Many minority families are unsupportive of schools and teachers. There are poisonous messages sent through hip-hop performers and others. Too often, "programs" set up to help minority youngsters wind up helping only the people running the programs. When questions are asked, the questioners are labeled "culturally insensitive." And of course, in covering this "dialogue," the press will be in the tank for the political left, adding to the dishonesty. We can have a true dialogue if we're determined to solve problems, not just add to the chatter of the salon class. Will that happen? Much may depend on President Obama. How will he introduce this "dialogue"? He gave a thoughtful speech to the NAACP several weeks ago, declaring that the age of excuses was over. Will that be taken seriously? Or will those who benefit from the excuses continue to rule? The most important weapon in this "dialogue" will be a calendar. It is 2009. It is not 1965. Will that be understood? July 26, 2009 Permalink
SATURDAY, JULY 25, 2009
COMMENT: It's hard to think of anything that Barbara Boxer contributes to the Senate. Maybe she brings nice chocolates on some days, or an orange. But there's not much beyond that. She's so weak that even liberal Democrats in her own delegation are afraid to let her handle one of their prime pieces of legislation, the one on alleged climate change. She recently embarrassed herself - not the first time - by demanding that an Army general call her "senator," whereas other senators are often called mister or ms. or mrs. President Kennedy would often get on the phone and say, "This is Mr. Kennedy." But Barbara likes the title. Carly Fiorina has no experience as a political candidate, and her reign at Hewlett-Packard was bumpy. She would be running in a heavily Democratic state. But if she could pull it off, she'd be a major national figure overnight, and give the California congressional delegation some balance. July 25, 2009 Permalink
The Politico reports on something Sarah said last night:
COMMENT: You can hear the laughter, sneers and ridicule from the crowd that pines for the 1960s. But words like that resonate with the great majority of Americans. I especially liked "...never apologize for our country." Clearly, that was directed at President Obama. Does that line hint at future political plans for Sarah Palin? I don't know. We've said here before that needs to improve some aspects of her approach - to get up to speed on more issues, to develop a sound and appealing program. But she has that gut appeal that can, if properly developed, move mountains. She is ever interesting, and we'll be following her. July 25, 2009 Permalink
Oh, no, no. Can you just see that White House session in the Oval Office, with the president of the United States presiding? "Now how do you feel about this, Henry? And you, Sergeant Stupid, I mean Crowley? Do you both feel greater comfort with each other? You do? Okay, how about a big hug?" Watch. The next stop will be Oprah. Another hug. A book deal.
Oh really? Then why did you say you wanted to keep the incident alive and do a documentary about it?
Translated: Please invite me to the White House, too. I wonder if they'll allow wall-to-wall TV coverage of the visit. How about a theme song? Something, maybe, from "Law and Order." Yuch. July 25, 2009 Permalink
They can't blame it on Bush forever.
That nails it. The Europeans are learning their lesson, and we're forgetting what they've learned.
COMMENT: This is clear-headed thinking, and a sharp warning to a president who spent a good chunk of his formative years being tutored by people who either don't understand the American spirit, or despise it. Crunch time has come early for Barack Obama. The direction he takes, and the good or bad luck he has domestically and in foreign affairs, will determine the fate of his presidency, and whether he gets that coveted second term. July 25, 2009 Permalink
Even worst for the president is what Rasmussen calls his presidential approval index - the spread between those who strongly approve and strongly disapprove. Today that index sets a new negative record, and stands at -9. Only 30% strongly approve, but 39% strongly disapprove. It is extraordinary, this early in a presidency, for 39% of likely voters to strongly disapprove of a president's performance. Now, again, we stress, as we always do, that a poll is a snapshot in time, has a margin of error, and does not predict conditions a year from today. But the numbers cannot give Mr. Obama's political advisers a nice day. The particular danger for Mr. Obama is not disapproval of this policy or that. Policies can be adjusted. But I just get the gut feeling - and at this point that's all it is - that a number of voters are starting to have negative personal feelings about the man. Up to know, it has been Mr. Obama's personal popularity that has sustained him, even as growing numbers doubted his policies. But his performance at his news conference this week, with constant references to himself and his appalling remarks about an arrest in Cambridge, Massachusetts, brought out some of the worst in Barack Obama, an imperious quality, president as ultimate judge and father of us all. Some viewers may not have come in way feeling the love they'd felt on the previous date. The president is in trouble. But remember that other presidents have been in trouble and have bounced back. Mr. Obama is a consummate politician. Those around him brought an unknown African-American politician from obscurity to the White House. And the press is too often his loyal and devoted servant. Keep your guard up. The forces of reason, sanity and greatness still have much work to do. July 25, 2009 Permalink
|
"What you see is news. What you know is background. What you feel is opinion." THE ANGEL'S CORNER Part I of this week's Angel's Corner was e-mailed late Wednesday night. Part II was sent late Friday night.
SUBSCRIPTIONS Subscriptions to URGENT AGENDA are voluntary. Why subscribe to something you're getting free? To help guarantee that you'll continue to get it at all, and to get The Angel's Corner, which we now offer to subscribers and donators. Subscriptions sustain us. Payments are through PayPal and are secure, but you do not have to sign up for a PayPal account. Credit cards are fine.
FOR A SIX-MONTH ($26) SUBSCRIPTION, CLICK: IF YOU DON'T WISH A SET SUBSCRIPTION, BUT PREFER TO DONATE ANY OTHER AMOUNT TO SUSTAIN URGENT AGENDA, CLICK:
THE CURRENT QUESTION Last week we asked: When negotiations over Iran's nuclear program fail, would you be in favor of a preemptive attack on that country's nuclear installations by the United States, and why? You can view the answers here.
President Obama has been in office six months. What do you see for him and his policies in the next six months? If you'd like to send us your thoughts, click:
POWER LINE It's a privilege for me to post periodic pieces at Power Line. To go to Power Line, click here. To link to my Power Line pieces, go here.
CONTACT YOU CAN E-MAIL US, AS FOLLOWS: If you have wonderful things to say about this site, if it makes you a better person, please click: If you have a general comment on anything you see here, or on anything else that's topical, please click:
|
|
| ````` | ```````` | ||